Blog · Working Capital

A Lower Oil Price Does Not Mean the Supply Chain Is Safe

A Lower Oil Price Does Not Mean the Supply Chain Is Safe

Supply-Chain Risk and Working-Capital Planning

Oil prices fell sharply on August 25, but the global energy system did not suddenly become secure.

The daily market price reflected reduced concern about immediate military escalation. The physical supply network remained concentrated across conflict-affected countries, disrupted shipping lanes and damaged refining infrastructure.

That distinction matters for businesses far beyond the energy industry.

A temporary decline in input prices does not remove the need to finance inventory, protect margins and prepare for interruptions that can outlast the price move.

For manufacturers, contractors, transportation companies, property owners and capital partners, the central risk is no longer just what fuel costs today. It is whether critical materials can arrive on time, at a known price and on payment terms the company can support.

The strongest businesses will treat supply-chain resilience as a capital-planning issue—not simply a purchasing issue.

More than 43% of global oil production is connected to conflict

Countries affected by wars, sanctions or related disruption produced approximately 45 million barrels of oil per day in 2025, representing more than 43% of global supply, according to Reuters calculations using International Energy Agency data. The affected production includes Iran and other Middle Eastern suppliers, Russia, Kazakhstan, Libya and Venezuela. Reuters, August 25

Reuters also reported that more than 10% of global refining capacity was offline and that the current Gulf supply disruption was estimated at 5 million to 7 million barrels per day.

The Strait of Hormuz demonstrates the degree of concentration. Before the current conflict, approximately one-fifth of global petroleum liquids consumption moved through the waterway. The U.S. Energy Information Administration estimates that flows fell from 21.6 million barrels per day in the fourth quarter of 2025 to 4.9 million barrels per day in the second quarter of 2026. EIA Short-Term Energy Outlook

Governments have already used extraordinary measures to cushion the shock. On March 11, the International Energy Agency’s 32 member countries agreed to release 400 million barrels from emergency reserves—the largest coordinated stock release in the agency’s history. International Energy Agency

Those buffers bought time. They did not remove the concentration.

Oil fell 3% while physical risks remained

Brent crude fell 2.98% to $89.42 per barrel and West Texas Intermediate declined 3.14% to $82.34 during August 25 trading. Markets interpreted the latest U.S. sanctions campaign against Iran as less threatening to supply than renewed military escalation. Reuters’ August 25 market report

The same report documented continued physical risk:

  • The Strait of Hormuz remained largely closed.
  • Only two tankers transited the strait on August 24, the lowest daily commodity-vessel count since early May.
  • An oil tanker was disabled near Oman after being struck by an unidentified projectile.
  • A Russian refinery suspended operations following a drone strike.
  • A fire disrupted a refinery in Kazakhstan.

The price moved lower because one perceived risk changed.

The supply system remained vulnerable to several others.

Executives should be careful about using a one-day commodity move as evidence that the operating risk has passed. Financial markets can reprice expectations immediately. Shipping routes, refinery repairs, insurance capacity and industrial production cannot adjust as quickly.

Input concentration can be hidden several suppliers away

Many businesses believe they are diversified because they purchase from several domestic vendors.

That conclusion may be premature.

Three U.S. suppliers may all depend on:

  • The same overseas refinery
  • The same petrochemical feedstock
  • The same shipping route
  • The same specialty component manufacturer
  • The same port
  • The same freight carrier
  • The same electricity market
  • The same insurance provider

The company’s direct vendor list can appear diversified while its underlying supply remains concentrated.

Management should map at least the first two levels of its critical supply chain:

  1. Which supplier invoices the company?
  2. Where does that supplier obtain the essential material or component?
  3. Which country, route, refinery or processing facility is involved?
  4. How much substitute capacity exists?
  5. How long would qualification of a replacement take?

This is especially important for petroleum-derived inputs such as plastics, chemicals, coatings, adhesives, packaging, asphalt, synthetic materials and transportation-dependent products.

Energy exposure often enters the income statement through several lines without being labeled “fuel.”

A supply disruption creates a working-capital problem before a revenue problem

When supply becomes uncertain, businesses often respond by purchasing earlier, ordering more or accepting less favorable payment terms.

Those actions protect operations but consume cash.

A company may need to fund:

  • Larger raw-material inventories
  • Deposits to secure production
  • Earlier supplier payments
  • Higher freight and insurance costs
  • Alternative transportation routes
  • Expedited shipping
  • Safety-stock storage
  • Quality testing for replacement vendors
  • Duplicate tooling or components
  • Additional customs and compliance expenses
  • Temporary gross-margin compression

The cash requirement can arrive months before the higher cost is recovered through customer pricing.

Suppose a manufacturer normally holds 30 days of inventory but increases that buffer to 75 days. Even if the unit price remains unchanged, the company has tied up an additional 45 days of cash in materials.

If prices rise at the same time, the working-capital requirement expands twice: the company owns more units and pays more for each one.

Revenue may remain stable while liquidity tightens sharply.

More inventory is not automatically safer

Building inventory can reduce production-interruption risk.

It can also introduce new risks:

  • Obsolescence
  • Spoilage
  • Theft
  • Storage expense
  • Quality deterioration
  • Product redesign
  • Customer cancellation
  • Falling replacement prices
  • Restricted cash availability
  • Reduced borrowing-base eligibility

The correct inventory buffer depends on the material.

Standardized inputs with broad secondary markets may retain value. Highly specialized components tied to one customer or product design may be difficult to liquidate. A lender will not necessarily give full borrowing value to inventory simply because management considers it essential.

Before increasing stock, the company should determine:

  • Minimum operational quantity
  • Expected disruption period
  • Shelf life and storage requirements
  • Alternative uses
  • Supplier return rights
  • Customer commitments
  • Insurance coverage
  • Liquidation value
  • Financing advance rate

Resilience should not become uncontrolled stockpiling.

Inventory financing must reflect liquidation value

Inventory facilities can help finance qualified raw materials and finished goods.

Availability usually depends on eligibility criteria and an advance rate applied to a conservative value—not the amount the company paid.

Capital providers may evaluate:

  • Historical turnover
  • Appraised net orderly liquidation value
  • Product concentration
  • Customer specificity
  • Location and control
  • Perishability
  • Ownership and title
  • Existing liens
  • Supplier reclamation rights
  • Insurance
  • Reporting quality

A business may spend $5 million on critical materials and receive far less than $5 million of borrowing availability.

Management should forecast the actual borrowing base after reserves and ineligible items. The stated facility size is not the same as usable liquidity.

A blended structure may combine inventory financing with receivables availability, customer deposits or sponsor equity for the portion lenders cannot responsibly advance.

Receivables financing solves timing—not weak margins

Invoice factoring and accounts-receivable financing can accelerate cash after goods or services have been delivered and valid invoices issued.

That can be valuable when higher input costs lengthen the period between supplier payment and customer collection.

Receivables financing does not correct an unprofitable contract.

If material, fuel and freight costs rise while the customer price remains fixed, converting the invoice to cash sooner will not restore the lost margin. The business receives an inadequate amount more quickly.

Management should monitor profitability by order and customer, including:

  • Original quoted cost
  • Current replacement cost
  • Freight and insurance
  • Overtime and expedited handling
  • Financing expense
  • Customer credits or chargebacks
  • Warranty exposure
  • Net contribution after all variable costs

The first underwriting question is whether the transaction remains profitable.

The second is how to finance the timing gap.

Contracts should allocate extraordinary cost changes

Supply-chain risk is easier to finance when customer contracts explain what happens after an extraordinary cost increase or delay.

Useful provisions may include:

  • Material-price escalation clauses
  • Fuel surcharges
  • Freight adjustments
  • Change-order procedures
  • Customer deposits
  • Progress payments
  • Minimum purchase commitments
  • Cancellation charges
  • Delivery-window flexibility
  • Substitution rights
  • Force-majeure treatment
  • Storage fees
  • Reimbursement for noncancelable materials

These terms must be drafted and reviewed by qualified counsel for the specific transaction and jurisdiction.

The commercial principle is straightforward: a supplier should not accept unlimited exposure to costs it cannot control while the customer retains unlimited cancellation flexibility.

Customers may resist sharing the risk.

The supplier should explain the operational reality clearly. Dedicated inventory, expedited logistics and reserved capacity require capital. If the customer wants guaranteed availability during a disrupted market, the contract should support part of that commitment.

Transportation companies face both cost and collateral pressure

Trucking, delivery, towing, construction-hauling and logistics companies experience energy shocks quickly.

Fuel must be purchased before many customers pay their invoices. Higher prices therefore increase the weekly cash requirement even when revenue is growing.

Operators should track:

  • Fuel cost per mile
  • Surcharge recovery by customer
  • Lag between fuel purchase and reimbursement
  • Empty miles
  • Route profitability
  • Driver and equipment utilization
  • Maintenance expense
  • Insurance
  • Receivables aging
  • Customer concentration

A fuel surcharge can protect margin but still leave a timing gap. The carrier pays at the pump today and may collect the related invoice in 30, 60 or 90 days.

Receivables financing may help convert eligible invoices into current operating cash. Equipment financing should remain reserved for tractors, trailers and durable assets rather than filling a recurring fuel deficit.

If the company cannot recover fuel cost through pricing or operational efficiency, additional debt may postpone rather than solve the problem.

Contractors need to price mobilization and material risk separately

Construction companies can be exposed through fuel, asphalt, roofing products, plastics, insulation, equipment transport and imported materials.

The contract may be signed months before the materials are purchased.

Contractors should understand:

  • Which prices are locked
  • How long supplier quotes remain valid
  • Whether deposits are refundable
  • When materials must be ordered
  • Whether the owner will approve substitutions
  • Which costs qualify for change orders
  • How retainage affects liquidity
  • When completed work becomes billable
  • Whether invoices can be assigned

A profitable project at bid date can become marginal before mobilization.

Purchase-order or supplier financing may support approved material purchases before billing. Factoring or receivables financing may help after work is completed, accepted and invoiced. Equipment financing can support durable assets used across projects.

The financing must follow the construction cycle—not simply the contract amount.

Commercial real estate underwriting should include energy-sensitive expenses

Property owners may not purchase crude oil, but energy disruption can affect:

  • Utilities
  • Tenant operating costs
  • Property insurance
  • Construction materials
  • Repairs and maintenance
  • Landscaping and transportation
  • Vendor pricing
  • Tenant sales and credit

Triple-net leases may transfer many operating expenses to tenants. They do not eliminate the owner’s exposure if higher occupancy costs weaken tenant coverage or increase default risk.

Gross leases expose the owner more directly because expense increases may not be recovered until renewal or reconciliation.

Sponsors should stress-test:

  • Net operating income after higher utilities and insurance
  • Tenant fixed-charge coverage
  • Expense-recovery timing
  • Capital-improvement costs
  • Construction and tenant-improvement budgets
  • Permanent-loan proceeds
  • Debt-service coverage

A property can maintain occupancy while its financeability deteriorates because operating expenses reduce sustainable net income.

Acquisition diligence should test supply-chain dependence

Buyers often focus on customer concentration.

Supplier and geographic concentration can be equally important.

An acquisition target may report stable historical margins because its critical input was consistently available at favorable prices. That history may not reflect the current operating environment.

Buyers should investigate:

  • Critical materials by revenue contribution
  • Sole-source suppliers
  • Country and route exposure
  • Supplier contract terms
  • Safety-stock requirements
  • Alternative-vendor qualification time
  • Price-pass-through history
  • Inventory write-offs
  • Gross margin by customer
  • Working-capital seasonality
  • Insurance and business-interruption protection

The acquisition model should reflect the cash needed to operate after closing—not just the purchase price.

A company that historically required $5 million of working capital may require $8 million after increasing safety stock and accepting shorter supplier terms. If the financing stack funds only the seller consideration, the buyer may inherit an immediate liquidity gap.

Family offices can finance resilience—but should verify the asset

Supply disruption can create opportunities for family offices and specialty capital providers.

Potential structures include:

  • Inventory-backed facilities
  • Receivables financing
  • Purchase-order financing
  • Equipment loans
  • Senior secured working capital
  • Preferred equity
  • Acquisition capital
  • Commercial real estate financing

The investor should distinguish necessary resilience from speculative inventory accumulation.

Important diligence includes:

  • Verified customer demand
  • Purchase commitments
  • Gross margin after current costs
  • Inventory value and control
  • Insurance
  • Supplier reliability
  • Borrowing-base reporting
  • Use of proceeds
  • Downside liquidity
  • Primary and secondary repayment

An elevated yield does not compensate for inventory that has no alternate buyer or a customer contract that allows cancellation without cost.

The most attractive opportunity is often a profitable operating cycle disrupted by timing—not a weak business attempting to borrow through a structural loss.

The Apex perspective: finance continuity before the disruption arrives

At Apex Commercial Funding, we view the latest oil-market developments as a reminder that concentration risk should be included in every serious capital assessment.

The oil price can fall while the physical system remains fragile. Businesses should therefore plan around cash requirements and operational continuity rather than attempting to predict the next daily market move.

Our analysis begins with five questions:

  1. Which critical input can stop production or service delivery?
  2. Where does that input originate beyond the direct supplier?
  3. How much additional cash is required to extend the inventory buffer?
  4. Can higher costs be passed through, and how long does recovery take?
  5. Which assets—receivables, inventory, equipment or real estate—can support appropriately matched financing?

Depending on the answers, an appropriate structure may include:

  • Invoice factoring
  • Accounts-receivable financing
  • Asset-based lending
  • Purchase-order financing
  • Inventory financing
  • Equipment financing
  • Conventional working-capital lines
  • Commercial real estate financing
  • Private credit
  • Preferred or joint-venture equity
  • A blended capital structure

The objective is not to borrow enough to purchase every available input.

It is to protect profitable operations with a measured inventory plan, enforceable customer economics and adequate liquidity if the disruption lasts longer than expected.

Build the liquidity buffer before suppliers change the terms

More than 43% of global oil production is now connected to conflict-affected countries. That concentration reaches businesses through fuel, freight, refining, materials, insurance and customer demand.

One day of lower oil prices does not reverse those dependencies.

Companies should identify critical inputs, map underlying supplier concentration, calculate the cash required for additional inventory and review customer contracts before another disruption changes price or availability.

Arranging capital early preserves choice. Waiting until suppliers demand deposits, freight costs surge or production is interrupted usually narrows it.

If your company needs capital to secure inventory, fulfill contracts or bridge the period between supplier payment and customer collection, Apex Commercial Funding can help assess the complete operating cycle and compare appropriate receivables, inventory, equipment, real estate and private-capital structures.

Contact James Fillmore II at James@apexcommercialfunding.com or 240-535-9291 for a confidential working-capital assessment.

Financing and investment opportunities are subject to underwriting, due diligence, collateral and contract eligibility, lender or investor requirements, market conditions, applicable laws and final approval. Commodity prices, supply conditions and financing availability may change without notice. Businesses should consult qualified legal, tax, accounting, insurance and supply-chain advisers. This article is informational and does not constitute an offer of credit or securities, legal advice, tax advice or investment advice.

Hashtags: #WorkingCapital #SupplyChainFinance #InventoryFinancing #InvoiceFactoring #AssetBasedLending #CommercialFinance #BusinessContinuity #PrivateCredit #ApexCommercialFunding

← All articles